Re: Drawings similar to well known products. Copyright problems?
On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 12:56:37AM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 07:13:21PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> > It's pretty clear what the intent was -- those are intended to
> > represents specific brands. I have no idea if that's permitted or not.
>
> Of course it's allowed, you blithering idiot. This has got to be the
> most *random* thing I've seen on -legal in months.
"I don't know" is random, and makes him a "blithering idiot" to be flamed?
Your bursts of undeserved incivility (see also
[🔎] 20050108225050.GB24426@suffields.me.uk) are quickly starting to overwhelm
your contribution to this list. Find a better outlet, please.
--
Glenn Maynard
Reply to: