Re: Review needed: Gentium font re-released under the SIL Open Font License
other key members of the community including Jim Gettys from GNOME
already told us OFL 1.0 was free)
I seriously don't think so. The mentioned violation of the DFSG also
applies to the GNU Freedoms.
I'm not so sure about that...
See this post from Jim Gettys for example:
RMS does think the license (version 1.0) is free, that's what he has
told us via email. Anyway, let's wait for the FSF's official position.
DFSG 1: Gentium can be sold as part of _any_ software agregate
DFSG 6: I don't think there's any discrimination here at all as the OFL
explicitely mentions the ability to sell
Can you please elaborate a bit more on why you think the OFL violates
the DFSG? What do you think of the Vera Bitstream or the Arphic licenses
then? What do other -legal members think?