Re: Mozilla can't be GPL?
Gervase Markham wrote:
Lewis Jardine wrote:
I'd expect Mozilla are interested in getting this file BSDed as part
of their tri-licensing project, so it might make sense to simply draw
Mozilla's attention to this problem and leave approaching RSA to them.
There seems to be some confusion about Mozilla's current and future
licensing status in this thread. The topic implies Mozilla is under the
GPL; this isn't true until the relicensing project is finished. We hope
to have that done soon, but it's not done yet. The above comment
suggests that we are relicensing to a BSD-like licence; that also isn't
true, the target relicensing scheme is an MPL/LGPL/GPL tri-licence.
Apologies for the confusion: I was meaning that RSA would have to supply
the file under BSD or similar in order for Mozilla to MPL it.