Re: Mozilla can't be GPL? (was: pkcs#11 license)
Ludovic Rousseau <ludovic.rousseau@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also checked the licence of the PDF file and it _also_ contains a
> publicity clause. [...]
Would we need to copy the document? I think it would just be taking
some ideas from it and re-expressing them, but I could be wrong.
> It seams the only human possible solution is to ask RSA to change their
> licence. I guess the Mozilla foundation could help if they care about
> licencing issues.
It seems Gervase Markham has seen this. I hope that Netscape had
permission too, but IIRC the burden is on redistributors to have
reasonable documentation of that. :-/
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to: