On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 23:35:57 -0400 Joe Smith wrote:
>
> "Francesco Poli" <frx@winstonsmith.info> wrote in message
> [🔎] 20050926194745.7a44533a.frx@winstonsmith.info">news:[🔎] 20050926194745.7a44533a.frx@winstonsmith.info...
>
> >As I already said, I'm not so convinced that a pseudonym "identifies"
> >a person. In fact, it does (almost) the opposite, I would say.
> >It builds a 'fake' identity, but hides the real identity of its
> >owner.
> >
> >IMHO, it's not so clear that a pseudonym would be perfectly
> >acceptable...
>
> On the other hand, if virtually everyhting a certain person does is
> done under that pseudonym, then argumably the pseudonym would
> identify said person better than the persons real name.
There's no guarantee that a person uses only one pseudonym and never
uses his/her real name.
[...]
> It is very hard to draw the line.
That is the reason why we cannot safely assume that a pseudonym would be
perfectly acceptable in the eyes of this license...
--
:-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpM9oq5EUNBf.pgp
Description: PGP signature