Re: Linux Documentation Project License (LDPL) v2.0
Le lundi 26 septembre 2005 à 12:09 -0300, Humberto Massa a écrit :
> > 2. The person making the modifications must be
> > identified.
>
> Yellow alert -- dissident test. Marco d'Itri is extremely vocal
> against the Dissident Test, but I think anonymity is necessary for
> Free Software.
"Identified" doesn't mean it should be identified by a real name. A
pseudonym is perfectly acceptable.
> IMHO they do NOT comply with the DFSG. In the case someone wants to
> know, the following modifications would render this license
> completely "clean" in my opinion:
I disagree. This license has poor wording, but is completely free
nevertheless.
> Substitute "source format", in the following paragraph, by "in the
> format the original author chose to write and modify the work OR in
> the format the derivative work's author chose to write and modify
> the work OR in any format that could demonstrably be translated back
> and forth to one of those formats without loss of information."
This wording is even worse than "source format", IMHO.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\
: :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org
`. `' joss@debian.org
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Reply to: