Re: Linux Documentation Project License (LDPL) v2.0
Francesco Poli <email@example.com> wrote:
> 1. The modified version must be labeled as such.
> 2. The person making the modifications must be identified.
Fails the dissident test, but there's some level of disagreement over
whether that matters.
> 3. Acknowledgement of the original author must be retained.
> 4. The location of the original unmodified document be identified.
I don't think this ought to be a problem.
> 5. The original author's (or authors') name(s) may not be used to
> assert or imply endorsement of the resulting document without t=
> original author's (or authors') permission.
The others are requests rather than requirements, so there's no problem
there. In summary - I'd be surprised if anyone filed RC bugs against
stuff under this license.
Matthew Garrett | firstname.lastname@example.org