[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Linux Documentation Project License (LDPL) v2.0



On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:34:47 +0100 Matthew Garrett wrote:

> The others are requests rather than requirements, so there's no
> problem there.

Ooh!   :p
I apologize for this: I was sure I had read "required", rather than
"requested"!  :-(
Thanks for pointing out.

OK, my fault, please ignore everything I said about clause A.2bis...

We only have clause A.2 issues standing, now.


-- 
    :-(   This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS?   ;-)
......................................................................
  Francesco Poli                             GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpJ9c1A9n2s8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: