Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:27:35PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> It makes it inconvenient for users and debian-legal, needing to
> know local absurdities of Seaforth or whereever's court procedures.
By this reasoning, we should reject every package for which someone holds
copyright, because it is inconvenient for us to know the local absurdities of
copyright law of Seaforth or whereever.
--Adam
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Humberto Massa Guimarães <humberto.massa@almg.gov.br>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: David Nusinow <david_nusinow@verizon.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Francesco Poli <frx@winstonsmith.info>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: David Nusinow <david_nusinow@verizon.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net>
- Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop>