Re: CDDL
Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> wrote:
> Here's what I have in mind:
> http://people.debian.org/~asuffield/licenses/cddl/summary.html
It looks a comprehensive minute apart from repeated points, but
some of the stock language needs a tune-up (Who cares whether the
licence is DFSG-free? We package software not licences!) and you
already plan to work on the presentation. I think the biggest
improvements would be to replace message-id on the index with
a format like local_part.MMDD.HH:MM (so henning.0909.14:51 is
the first) and to use a dl instead of a ul for the first level.
In general, I'm impressed and the idea could be used in a lot
of places to avoid sending everyone to wade through tons of
verbose mail. Will the mail-minute-maker scripts be released?
Best wishes,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CDDL
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: CDDL
- From: Francesco Poli <frx@winstonsmith.info>
- References:
- CDDL
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
- Re: CDDL
- From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>