Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- To: Sven Luther <email@example.com>
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
- Subject: Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
- From: Dalibor Topic <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 15:55:56 +0200
- Message-id: <432042EC.email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <20050908123005.GA23549@localhost.localdomain>
- References: <20050906230421.GU1747@schuldei.org> <20050906230421.GU1747@schuldei.org> <20050907001650.GA4110@localhost.localdomain> <E1ECnus-0003Wafirstname.lastname@example.org> <20050907003910.GA4306@localhost.localdomain> <email@example.com> <20050907124759.GD1676@keitarou.queanbeyan.bubblesworth.net> <20050907214815.GA23389@tennyson.dodds.net> <20050908081450.GA21495@localhost.localdomain> <20050908090612.GC28013@tennyson.dodds.net> <20050908123005.GA23549@localhost.localdomain>
Sven Luther wrote:
Notice that we already accepted a CDDLed program in debian, namely the star
packages which comes with this clause :
The application of the
United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale
of Goods is expressly excluded.
That's my favourite bit of lawyerese in MPL-derivative licenses.
I wish they had expressly excluded the sharia law on software licenses
as practised by the late Taleban ruling Kandahar.
So, i wonder why it was accepted, if it was non-free. But maybe we just passed
it up silently and didn't notice ? Who was the ftp-master responsible for
letting this one enter the archive, and can he comment on this ?
I guess it was a mistake.
star used to be under the GPL, and then Joerg Schilling changed the
license to CDDL. The respective change was at
http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/star/news/4.html and the license change
did not seem to have been discussed on debian-legal. The discussions on
CDDL in 2005-01 seem to have petered out inconclusively.