[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Rules for submitting licenses for review



On 18 Aug 2005 17:42:47 GMT MJ Ray wrote:

[...]
> > Could I submit a license for
> > review just for my own personal interest and even though it is
> > unlikely said license will ever be used in debian free or non-free?
> 
> You could, but you will probably get a lower response. Please
> try more general forums like those hosted by the FSFs or on
> Usenet. (I'm not really up-to-date: where should we refer to?)

It's true that discussing licenses in a vacuum is not (should not be)
debian-legal business, but nonetheless there is an issue with your
advice, IMHO.
Trying other 'forums' will probably produce a *different* answer.
We use the DFSG as the guidelines to determine if a work is free or not.
Other groups/foundations/projects use *different* criteria.

I'm referring to well-known cases such as Debian and FSF disagreeing
about the GFDL, and similar ones.

So, what I ask myself is:

| if you feel that the DFSG are the best criteria to determine the
| freeness of a work, what's the most appropriate place to discuss about
| the freeness of works released under a particular license?

To me it's difficult to answer anything but "debian-legal"...

-- 
    :-(   This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS?   ;-)
......................................................................
  Francesco Poli                             GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpAumS2vjeNb.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: