Re: CECILL license status?
news about CECILL's DSFG status?
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 01:22, Achim Bohnet wrote:
> On Thursday 28 July 2005 09:11, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Achim Bohnet:
> > > [please cc me, i'm not subscribed to d-l]
> > > Hi,
> > > new digikamimageplugin > 0.7.3 release
> > >
> > > a) contains now a header file that uses the CeCILL license.
> > > http://www.cecill.info/index.en.html
> > > http://www.cecill.info/licences.en.html
> > >
> > > b) this header file is included in files distributed under GPL.
> > Doesn't this mean that the author makes use of the GPL option in the
> > CeCILL license?
> Hi, [sorry for the late response.]
> No, by included I mean '#include file_under_cecill.h' in a GPL file.
> Here the actual code: file under CECILL license:
> is '##include "CImg.h"'d included in the GPL file:
> To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
> a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
> You discover truth everytime you use it.
> -- firstname.lastname@example.org
To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is
a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated.
You discover truth everytime you use it.