Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
* Steve McIntyre:
>>Why do you think this would change anything? Isn't this the
>>assumption under which debian-legal operates in general? With a few
>>practical exceptions, of course (license texts, public key
>>certificates, etc.), but the general rule seems to be followed.
>
> What?
>
> I'm astounded by your argument here. Go look in a dictionary,
> _please_. "Program" does not mean what you think it means. Re-defining
> a common word like this is not a good route for earning
> credibility.
I'm not redefining anything. I'm entirely descriptive. Have a look
at the list archives if you don't believe me.
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>