Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
* Andreas Barth:
> Actually, the DFSG says:
> | 2. Source Code
> | The program must include source code, and must allow distribution in
> | source code as well as compiled form.
> Obviously e.g. fonts are no programms, even if they are in main.
It's clear from the context (and previous discussion) that this has to
be interpreted as "software".
At least I hope so. It would be rather ridiculous if documentation
under the GNU FDL (with invariant sections, just to be sure) is not
DFSG-compliant, but some BSD-licensed non-editable PDF file is. 8-(