Re: Does DFSG#2 apply to non-programs?
* Francesco Poli:
> But if you propose to disable DFSG#2 for non-programs, you have to
> propose a criterion to tell programs and non-programs apart.
> IOW, you must be able to tell when DFSG#2 must be applied and when it
> may be ignored...
It's enough if we are sufficiently confident that such a distinction
can be made on a case-by-case basis. After all, there is no real
algorithm for testing DFSG compliance.
Personally, I think that we can make this distinction, but actually,
we shouldn't, at least for technical documentation which describes how
a program works. If we change the program, we sometimes need to
change the documentation. If it's in a closed format (even
non-proprietary ones, like DVI), this task is unnecessarily
complicated. Given its practical implications, I am really supprised
that this aspect is still controversial.
Reply to:
- References:
- generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Bas Wijnen <shevek@fmf.nl>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Does DFSG#2 apply to non-programs? [was: Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG]
- From: Francesco Poli <frx@winstonsmith.info>
- Re: Does DFSG#2 apply to non-programs? [was: Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG]
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Does DFSG#2 apply to non-programs?
- From: Francesco Poli <frx@winstonsmith.info>