Re: generated source files, GPL and DFSG
Glenn Maynard <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Uncommented source is not the same as source with comments stripped to make
> it harder to understand.
> The former is merely potentially bad source code, but clearly source. The
> latter is obfuscation, and is not source at all. Assuming what Florian
> says is accurate, Java bytecode is not source any more than C code with
> comments stripped, which would imply that Debian should not be accepting
> it as source.
So if I write C with comments and then remove them that's not DFSG free,
but if I fail to add them in the first place then it's fine for main?
Matthew Garrett | email@example.com