Re: LPPL and source-less distribution
On 6/12/05, Bernhard R. Link <email@example.com> wrote:
> * Michael K. Edwards <firstname.lastname@example.org> [050611 20:05]:
> > The FSF is not in the business of giving truthful advice about the
> > law.
> Sorry to ask the following, but I am getting really curious and hope
> you do not feel insulted. But I really have to ask:
> Are you sponsored by, employed by or otherwise related to Microsoft
> or any other large company selling non-free software?
I happen to work for a company which sells both hardware and software
(not Microsoft or any close relative), but not in any legal (or
polemical) capacity, and my opinions are my own. I've gotten so
deeply involved in this debate, and spent so much time on it, that I
gave a company lawyer of my acquaintance a heads-up last week; but
he's more likely to be horrified by the possibility of the company
becoming the target of a free-software-enthusiast vendetta than to