Re: openssl vs. GPL question
De: Steve Langasek [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> The phrase "For an executable work, complete source code means all
> the source code for all modules it contains" appears in the text
> of GPL section *3*, which is not specific to "works based on the
> Program." Such lack of attention to license detail from one who
> has so much to say on the subject is truly appalling.
So, are you arguing that things that *dynamically* link with some libraries do _contain_ said libraries?
Because IMHO neither ruby-zoom _contains_ libyaz nor libyaz _contains_ openssl.