[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: broadcom proposed firmware licence, please comment ...



Hi Sven,

On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 09:28:23PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> It seems our crusade to solve the dubious licencing of firmware inside the
> linux kernel source is starting to show is fruits. After the QLogic feedback 
> Andres Salomon reported in a previous mail, it is now Broadcom which is coming
> back to us with a licence proposal.

> Keep in mind that this was done under the assumption that a firmware embedded
> in the main kernel is an aggregate work (see mailing list archive for details,
> or discuss in a separate thread, CCing me if possible). This means that
> altough the firmware in itself remains non-free as far as the DFSG is
> concerned, it at least makes the whole file distributible again, which it was
> not while the firmware was distributed source-less under the GPL.

> The text of the new licence proposal is as follows :

> > +/* xxx.h: Broadcom tg3 network driver.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2004, 2005 Broadcom Corporation
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> > + * the Free Software Foundation, except as noted below.
> > + *
> > + * This file contains firmware data derived from proprietary unpublished
> > + * source code, Copyright (c) 2004, 2005 Broadcom Corporation.
> > + *
> > + * Permission is hereby granted for the distribution of this firmware data
> > + * in hexadecimal or equivalent format, provided this copyright notice is
> > + * accompanying it.
> > + */

> I would have liked a clear identification of the firmware blob, but i guess
> that to anyone familiar with C, it is immediately evident what is the firmware
> blob and what is normal code.

> So, before i reply to them, i would like to have feedback from debian-legal,
> and we can then move ahead and upload this driver to the non-free part of our
> archive, including a working .udeb.

I believe this proposed license gives Debian the permissions necessary to
allow distribution of the firmware blob in non-free.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: