[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GPL and linking



On 5/11/05, Michael K. Edwards <m.k.edwards@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/11/05, Raul Miller <moth.debian@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The law as written says that you do not have permission to copy
> > except as granted by a license.  Thus the GPL's license grant
> > is not only applicable, it's the issue which is most likely to be
> > contested in such a case.
> 
> Except for all the other times that you have permission to copy, as
> defined in the applicable statute and case law.  Which is not the
> point here anyway; the point is that it's an offer of contract, not a
> statute and not some magical creature of copyright law, and that means
> you are analyzing it from utterly the wrong angle and cannot possibly
> arrive at correct legal conclusions.  (IANAL, TINLA.)

At no point did I assume that the GPL was a statute, nor a 
magical creature.

In other words, you're begging the question.  (And arguing a
straw man.)

-- 
Raul



Reply to: