Re: Re: For thoughts: fair license
> Well, I can name one minor problem of the MIT license: it requires
that
> the license text be preserved. For most uses, this isn't a problem; but
> in the case where you're using bits of code under the license and releasing
> binaries, it's odd to carry along in your documentation a paragraph about
> rights granted to users for a bit of code that they weren't given source
> to.
How big are the bits?
Remember, inclusion of the license is only necessary in copies or
substantial portions. Heh. Although, as to what makes up a substantial
portion may be subject to argument, so I can imagine there being some
uncertainty there. ;)
--
Regards, James William Pye
Reply to: