Arnoud Engelfriet wrote: > Jacobo Tarrio wrote: >>O Xoves, 5 de Maio de 2005 ?s 10:36:09 +0200, Tomas Fasth escrib?a: >> >>> * 3. Redistributions in any form must be accompanied by information on >>> * how to obtain complete source code for the DB software and any >>> * accompanying software that uses the DB software. The source code >>> * must either be included in the distribution or be available for no >>> * more than the cost of distribution plus a nominal fee, and must be >>> * freely redistributable under reasonable conditions. For an >>> * executable file, complete source code means the source code for all >>> * modules it contains. It does not include source code for modules or >>> * files that typically accompany the major components of the operating >>> * system on which the executable file runs. >> >> This one is problematic as it does not specify for how long the "information >>on how to obtain complete source code" must be valid. > > You could simply say: "The source code is included in the > distribution, under src/". That seems to me to be "information > on how to obtain complete source code". So then you comply > with the license IMO. "The source code must either be included in the distribution or [...]" confirms that interpretation. This is the same logic we apply to the GPL: the issue of having a 3-year offer doesn't apply to us because we distribute the source alongside the binaries. - Josh Triplett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature