Re: More about GFDL
El Domingo 24 Abril 2005 04:36, Glenn Maynard escribió:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 04:15:28AM +0300, Cesar Martinez Izquierdo wrote:
> > El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escribió:
> > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Maciej Dems wrote:
> > > > I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion.
> > >
> > > For which the simple answer is:
> > > Read http://people.debian.org/~srivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml
> > I have the same question around for some months.
> > I have read the link above but I didn't find any reply.
> > Any extra clue?
> Those of us on d-legal have no idea what your question is; please restate
> it. :)
El Viernes 22 Abril 2005 14:37, Maciej Dems escribió:
> I have a simple question concerning the GFDL discussion.
> Does the GFDL documentation which currently does not contain any invariant
> section have to go to non-free as well?
> As I understand the problem, such documentation is free and only can loose
> its freeness in the future. But the same can be told about eg. any
> BSD-licensed program.