Re: [Fwd: Re: Bug#304316: section non-free/doc]
Michael K. Edwards <m.k.edwards@gmail.com> wrote:
> For the record, so long as implementations of software freedom are
> copyright-based, documents from which fragments cannot legally be cut
> and pasted into the software they accompany do not belong in main.
> This applies most emphatically to the GFDL and to RFCs, inconvenient
> as that may be.
When did license incompatibility become a freeness issue?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.legal@srcf.ucam.org
Reply to: