Re: public domain
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 02:11 pm, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 12:24:39PM -0800, Sean Kellogg wrote:
> > The US-centric critiques have been addressed[1].
>
> ...or not. That citation was inexplicably random. Did you simply pick
> the first thing which had somebody to do with CC and things which
> aren't in the US? I can't imagine how else you could have selected
> this, it appears to have no relevance.
Okay, well, now that the debate has entered into some strange parallel
demension where facts no bare no relevance, I shall return to my lurker
status on this list. Hope my comments were helpful to someone.
-Sean
Reply to: