Re: reiser4 non-free?

To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, ed@debian.org, cavok@debian.org
Subject: Re: reiser4 non-free?
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 09:03:11 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 40A0F93F.8020604@namesys.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200405111502.i4BF2qOu012463@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
References: <[🔎] 1084188152.26226.196158678@webmail.messagingengine.com> <[🔎] 20040510.214915.74754947.wlandry@ucsd.edu> <[🔎] 200405110158.i4B1wONb022531@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <[🔎] 20040510.223329.108738295.wlandry@ucsd.edu> <[🔎] 200405111502.i4BF2qOu012463@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>

Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:



I pondered the whole "credits" question for a bit last night, and I realized
that (a) I could account for at least the last 75 'mkfs' commands I had caused
to run, and (b) of those 75, exactly *one* did *not* have all of its output
swallowed by 'anaconda' during a RedHat or Fedora install.....

Yes, I believe that, and that is my concern.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: reiser4 non-free?
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu

References:
- Re: reiser4 non-free?
  - From: "Humberto Massa" <humberto.massa@almg.gov.br>
- Re: reiser4 non-free?
  - From: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>
- Re: reiser4 non-free?
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
- Re: reiser4 non-free?
  - From: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>
- Re: reiser4 non-free?
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu

Prev by Date: Re: The draft Position statement on the GFDL
Next by Date: Re: The draft Position statement on the GFDL
Previous by thread: Re: reiser4 non-free?
Next by thread: Re: reiser4 non-free?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread