Re: The draft Position statement on the GFDL
Raul Miller wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 09:18:00AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Oh. Well, the GFDL with Invariant Sections requires bloat in distributed
>> binaries.
>
> Where the GFDL is used to license programs, it's not something that we
> can distribute under the DFSG. [As this could require us to not fix
> security problems.]
Well, this applies to all texinfo manuals, then, which are distributed in
compiled 'info' form.
--
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Reply to: