[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: LCC and blobs

Raul Miller <moth@debian.org> wrote:
>> moth@debian.org wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 03:38:34PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> >Drivers for firmware, where the driver would typically be non-functional
>> >if we didn't ship some non-free software image, we've been treating as
>> >depending on non-free software.
>> No, "we" have not. A few people did.
> How is this a relevant distinction?  In any specific area of Debian,
> most of the work is done by a small number of people.

Debian-legal doesn't determine policy. There are packages of this type
in both main and contrib, and the ftp-masters don't seem too concerned
about the issue. As a project, we haven't made any decision whatsoever.

Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.legal@srcf.ucam.org

Reply to: