Re: LCC and blobs
Raul Miller <moth@debian.org> wrote:
>> moth@debian.org wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 03:38:34PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> >Drivers for firmware, where the driver would typically be non-functional
>> >if we didn't ship some non-free software image, we've been treating as
>> >depending on non-free software.
>
>> No, "we" have not. A few people did.
>
> How is this a relevant distinction? In any specific area of Debian,
> most of the work is done by a small number of people.
Debian-legal doesn't determine policy. There are packages of this type
in both main and contrib, and the ftp-masters don't seem too concerned
about the issue. As a project, we haven't made any decision whatsoever.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.legal@srcf.ucam.org
Reply to: