Re: LCC and blobs
> email@example.com wrote:
> >The relevant distinction is whether whether or not we consider there to
> >be an adequate abstraction barrier between the two pieces of code.
> >Other distinctions don't really matter.
> Then why you keep talking about where firmware is stored?
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 03:38:34PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >Drivers for firmware, where the driver would typically be non-functional
> >if we didn't ship some non-free software image, we've been treating as
> >depending on non-free software.
> No, "we" have not. A few people did.
How is this a relevant distinction? In any specific area of Debian,
most of the work is done by a small number of people.