Re: [xdebug-general] Re: Is the xdebug's non-free license necessary?
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >>This is much broader. For example, I cannot write a derivative called
> >>"Brian's Xdebug" or "Xdebug manual" or even "A third-party manual for
> > The manual is no problem, that's not a derived product.
> It could very well be a derivative; a manual might want to copy some of
> the code for illustrative purposes, or copy various comments.
IMO just copying a tiny bit of code or copying various comments does not
make something a derivate. I mean, com'on, other people can come up with
those same comments or tiny bits of code.
Xdebug | http://xdebug.org | firstname.lastname@example.org