Re: Is the xdebug's non-free license necessary?
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 08:27:31PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> Excluding a singleton name is fine. I'd even go so far as to say any
> excluding any countable set is fine. Excluding an uncountable class of
> names is not.
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/06/msg00023.html for a brief
prior discussion of this.
This clause is very poorly thought out, and I agree that it is clearly
beyond the explicit scope of DFSG#4.
It's not a battle I feel like fighting (in the general case), though.