[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is the xdebug's non-free license necessary?



On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 11:38:16PM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> * Jan Minar <jjminar@FastMail.FM> [041219 20:04]:
> 
> > AFAICT, the only non-free section is:
> > 
> > <quote href="http://www.xdebug.org/license.php";>
> > 4. Products derived from this software may not be called "Xdebug", nor
> > may "Xdebug" appear in their name, without prior written permission from
> > derick@xdebug.org.
> > </quote>
> 
> 
> Citing Debian Free Software Guidelines [1]:
> =====
> 4. Integrity of The Author's Source Code
> [..] The license may require derived works to carry a different name or
> version number from the original software. [..]
> =====

The difference is subtle, but important:

>>> nor may "Xdebug" appear in their name
                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

-- 
 )^o-o^|    jabber: rdancer@NJS.NetLab.Cz
 | .v  K    e-mail: jjminar FastMail FM
 `  - .'     phone: +44(0)7981 738 696
  \ __/Jan     icq: 345 355 493
 __|o|__Minář  irc: rdancer@IRC.FreeNode.Net

Attachment: pgpHytUEBGmH2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: