Re: Copyleft font licensing
* Raul Miller:
>> Anyway, this isn't the case I'm really interested in. And if there's
>> real source code, it should be reasonably clear that the GPL is
>> impractical.
>
> I don't really understand this. I suspect I'm not thinking what you're
> thinking "real sourced code" means.
A METAFONT program, for example.
> That said, if the GPL is really a problem, and you're the copyright
> holder, you could always use BSD's license.
Even if I were the copyright holder, I'd rather use a copyleft
license.
Reply to: