Re: CDF License
Mark Hymers <email@example.com> wrote:
> I'm concerned about the first sentence which seems to claim that for-profit
> distribution is not allowed unless it is part of another product. The
> clause seems a bit wooly to me.
There's no requirement that software be distributable for profit on its
own (though some believe that there should be). DFSG 1 is explicitly
written to allow that. The requirement to state that the code has been
modified is less awkward than what DFSG 4 allows, so I don't see any
problem with it.
Matthew Garrett | firstname.lastname@example.org