Re: GPL compatible license?

[Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>]

Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> A further issue: it never defines Elm Documentation, though it
> capitalizes it as if it were a proper noun.  So it's not clear to me
> whether this is trying to claim rights to Elm Documentation I write,
> independent of any copyrighted words produced by EDG.

I'd say it cannot, so it shouldn't be an issue.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
MIME - broken solution for a broken design.  -- Ralf Baechle

Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.