Re: GPL compatible license?
Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> A further issue: it never defines Elm Documentation, though it
> capitalizes it as if it were a proper noun. So it's not clear to me
> whether this is trying to claim rights to Elm Documentation I write,
> independent of any copyrighted words produced by EDG.
I'd say it cannot, so it shouldn't be an issue.
MIME - broken solution for a broken design. -- Ralf Baechle
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.