On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:16:21 +0200 Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> I think it is BSD-like license with advertising clause. Is it fit to
> the main archive?
What you quoted is *exactly* the 3-clause BSD license, with *no* OAC
(Obnoxious Advertising Clause).
You can compare with
/usr/share/common-licenses/BSD (as I did)
or with
http://www.fsf.org/licenses/info/BSD_3Clause.html
in case you want to check by yourself.
Any work released under such a license can go in main, provided that
* there is no indication that the copyright holder interprets the
license in some unusual (and non-free) ways
* the work is unencumbered by actively enforced software patents
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgpc2cs1wqLPC.pgp
Description: PGP signature