Re: a legal problem with 'filters' in germany
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: a legal problem with 'filters' in germany
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:28:59 +0200
- Message-id: <87654xvndw.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
- In-reply-to: <09d2dc6a18ccbf62dffc6c7a49ae21f0@bouncing.localnet> (MJ Ray's message of "Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:58:05 +0100")
- References: <09d2dc6a18ccbf62dffc6c7a49ae21f0@bouncing.localnet>
* MJ Ray:
> On 2004-10-22 18:24:02 +0100 martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
> wrote:
>
>> please refer to #277794. One single line needs to be erased from the
>> package because otherwise, the package is unconstitutional in
>> Germany (and Austria). [...]
>
> For other -legal contributors, this involves a comedy text filter
> ("kraut" I think) which emits "Sieg Heil" in certain conditions.
>
> Does s86 of StBG actually apply to software?
Yes, it does. The German release of Indiana Jones III (from
LucasArts) was edited as a result.
> Why isn't comedy exempt under paragraphs 4 or indeed basic human
> rights?
Comedy is indeed exempt. Of course, German TV stations broadcast
Monty Python and Fawlty Towers unedited.
It's another question whether it's a good idea to distribute such
potentially offensive software.
By the way, I would be much more concerned by chastity-list (which is
also horribly out of date).
Reply to: