Nathanael Nerode wrote: > I still do not believe that there is anything non-free about traditional > trademark rights; that there is nothing which actually constitutes > traditional trademark infringement which Debian would want to defend the > right to do. To the extent that those trademark rights cover simply claiming that something *is* that which the trademark refers to (like saying any x86 is a Pentium, or saying that your OS is Windows, for example), I agree; to the extent that they prohibit anything else (or rather, anything that isn't allowed by the DFSG), I think that's non-free. - Josh Triplett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature