Re: Open Software License v2.1
Raul Miller <moth@debian.org> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 07:38:14PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> The form of both is "Since <person> performs <action>, <person> shall
>> be punished by terminating their license". The claim was that this is
>> somehow acceptable.
>
> There are cases where this is acceptable.
>
> For example, where <action> involves distributing a GPL licensed program
> without including the copyright notices.
I disagree. I think the phrasing Andrew should have used is "Since
<person> performs <action reserved to licensor without this license>..."
> More generally, actions which would make free software not be treated as
> free software would seem to be acceptable actions to discriminate against.
That sounds overbroad.
-Brian
--
Brian Sniffen bts@alum.mit.edu
Reply to: