Re: Open Software License v2.1
Scripsit Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 10:02:10PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > It's not a complete defense, by the way - a smart patent owner would
> > just try to sue everybody else *but* the copyright holder who uses the
> > code instead.
> The OSL 2.1's clause causes termination if you allege patent violation
> in the work against any licensee.
OK.
--
Henning Makholm "It was intended to compile from some approximation to
the M-notation, but the M-notation was never fully defined,
because representing LISP functions by LISP lists became the
dominant programming language when the interpreter later became available."
Reply to: