A trademark license *has* to prohibit such things. Prohibiting misrepresenting the origin of the *logo* doesn't suffice. We have torequire that the logo, and anything "confusingly similar", is not used toidentify things which aren't Debian.
Aren't the debian trademarks restricted to a specified scope? As I understand English law: if debian is a computing-related trademark, its licence should not forbid use of the debian logo for a distributor of replacement body parts, for example, because that is far beyond what the trademark gives. I think forgetting that is the root of trying to use copyright law to create "supertrademarks".
-- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know Creative copyleft computing - http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ LinuxExpo.org.uk village 6+7 Oct http://www.affs.org.uk