Re: Free Art License
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 05:21:36PM +0200, Ingo Ruhnke wrote:
> I don't think so, undocumented source there is still a good chance to
> make modification, sure it might be more difficult, but I still have
> everything that I need to produce the binary. With the image however I
> only have the 'binary', I don't have any 'source' information that
> would allow me to modify the resulting work in any meaningfull way.
For a .png composed in the gimp, what would be the distinction between
these two cases?
Thanks,
--
Raul
Reply to: