Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 10:41:50AM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> GPL 9 is there so that I *can*
> release mine under "GPL v2 or later" and he can then integrate it into
> his, because there's explicit definition of what this means and how it
> works with the rest of the GPL.
That's one of the reasons for GPL section 9.
There's no basis for claiming that this is the only reason it exists.
--
Raul
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Brian Thomas Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Brian Thomas Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Brian Thomas Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Brian Thomas Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.
- From: Brian Thomas Sniffen <bts@alum.mit.edu>