Hi, I didn't check the sources, but from your description, if Am Di, den 10.08.2004 schrieb Jon Dowland um 17:12: > They later released it under the GPL licence[2]. is true, then > 1) The original ID licence and the heretic/hexen licence are both incompatible > with the GPL and thus attempts to mix them result in a combination which > cannot be included in debian nor non-free. Both licences are additionally > not DFSG free. is not true, since if they distribute the whole source as GPL licenced, it does not matter if they also distribute it under a different licence - we just take and use the GPL and everything is fine. The ID-licence therefore does not touch us. (Assuming of course, that the _whole_ source was once distributed by ID under the terms of the GPL) so far my pov, nomeata -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: joachimbreitner@amessage.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil