Re: Bug#261600: License violation
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 10:31:41PM +0100, Simon Kelley wrote:
>
> The license certainly doesn't say that usage must be done a *.rom, it
> says that use is permitted provided that _redistribution_ is done as
> header files or binary image files (and the copyright notices are
> included) Regardless of the need or otherwise of naming the files in the
> distribution as .rom, your statement is just false.
Ah sorry, my oversight. Then I guess renaming in postinst would be compliant
with the license.
--
Robert Millan
(Debra and Ian) (Gnu's Not (UNiplexed Information and Computing System))/\
(kernel of *(Berkeley Software Distribution))
Reply to: