Re: Bug#261600: License violation
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 11:16:34PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> That would sort out 'distribution', but the license says 'usage' must be
> done as *.rom. However, then we wouldn't be violating upstream license since
> it is up to the user to illegaly use the package.
If the only possible use of the package is in violation of the license,
there's a problem, though. (Debian wouldn't distribute an installer for
a program whose license said "no auto-installers", even in non-free, I hope.)
--
Glenn Maynard
Reply to: