Re: DRAFT: debian-legal summary of the QPL
Matthew Palmer writes:
>On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 10:48:23PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>>
>> I am against it in principle. Having them subscribe to the debian-*-changes
>> mailing list is an active effort of their part, while we willingly push data
>> to them.
>
>So you're now not OK with the QPL's requirement that we push data to the
>initial developer of a QPL'd work, I take it, since you're against Debian
>pushing data to the US government?
The US government and the initial developer are rather different - the
initial developer at least has some reasonable link to the software.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
Support the Campaign for Audiovisual Free Expression: http://www.eff.org/cafe/
Reply to: