Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG: QPL 6c argumentation.

[Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <edmundo@rano.org>]

Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>:

> since a given software can either be a modification of the original software
> (which can replace it) or link with the original or modified software (and
> thus use it).

One last attempt:

I create a program P that consists of an executable X linked with a
library L. X links with L, but P is a modification of L, albeit a
modification that was made by adding material to L.

If the word "modify" excludes modifications made by adding stuff then
I suspect that quite a lot of licences will need reexamination.