Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG, new summary
On 2004-07-23 11:59:33 +0100 Sven Luther <email@example.com>
[...] ask himself if he honestly
believes to have the legal background enough to make claim.
I assume that this is not a suggestion that only replies of certified
lawyers have value, else your contribution has no value either. As
such, I think it's poor form to post such confusing wording. In
general, I feel your entire preamble has too much venom, suspicion and
insult for readers. Consensus-building is unlikely while you abuse all
readers before they do anything to you.
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing
Please email about: BT alternative for line rental+DSL;
Education on SMEs+EU FP6; office filing that works fast